[ad_1]
Under Sec. 9, Rule XIII (Prohibitions), Revised Omnibus Rules on Appointments and Other Personnel Actions (CSC MC No. 40, s. 1998), the following are the rules on Nepotism:
Sec. 9. No appointment in the national, provincial, city or municipal governments or any branch or instrumentality thereof, including government owned or controlled corporations with original charters shall be made in favor of a relative of the appointing or recommending authority, or of the chief of the bureau or office or of the person exercising immediate supervision over the appointee.
Unless otherwise provided by law, the word “relative” and the members of the family referred to are those related within the third degree either of consanguinity or of affinity.
In the local government career service, the prohibition extends to the relatives of the appointing or recommending authority, within the fourth civil degree of consanguinity or affinity.
The following are exempted from the operation of the rules on nepotism:
a. persons employed in a confidential capacity
b. teachers
c. physicians
d. members of the Armed Forces of the Philippines
The nepotism rule covers all kinds of appointments whether original, promotional, transfer and reemployment regardless of status including casuals and contractuals except consultants.
Source: http://www.csc.gov.ph/forum/forum/questions-nepotism/69-nepotism
[ad_2]
What about the the paramour/kabit?
Who will determine f the personnel in the ofis f the appointee is related to the appointing authority? Or recomending authority? Maraming cases na ganyan bakit walang nangyayari? What is mgt doing? Wala!!!shit!!!
Clark Wendell
Ayan ito pala sagot sa tanong ko haha
I wonder what is the basis of this matrix